Small text iconNormal text iconLarge text icon

INTERACTION

 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MembersMembers   GroupsGroups   RegisterRegister 
 User Control PanelUser Control Panel      LoginLogin 


All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu May 31, 2007 12:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 11:27 am
Posts: 242
Location: Bethesda, Gwynedd
Is there any accepted reference for grammar these days? There’s a whole host of on-line guides, I know, but I’m reluctant to use any of them because I’m not sure if they’re for U.S. English, U.K. English, or how up-to-date they are. And the other problem is, of course, that the rules have changed since I went to school.

“You see,” Foxie went on, “when I was at school, I was told that you could break up direct speech with commas, thusly. But recently I heard,” he added. “That after you interrupt speech, you need a new sentence to start direct speech again. Thusly.” Is there any authority out there to give an objective ruling on this, or is it just editor’s preference?

Also on the subject of direct speech, I was again told at school that you should spell out individual letters phonetically. You would, for example, write, “eye-dee” instead of “I.D.” I can see the point with “O.K.” verses “Okay,”, and “bar-b-q” verses “barbecue”, given that there are actual words for them. But if you’re writing out an acronym, it can get very clumpy and ugly, not to mention confusing for the reader. Would you type, “you-en-cee-ell-ee” instead of, “U.N.C.L.E.?”

I know this has the potential to turn into a very violent issue, but I figured a forum populated with writers and editors was probably one of the best places to ask.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 31, 2007 2:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 1:37 pm
Posts: 174
Location: Brighton, UK
I think spelling out individual letters would be mighty daft. A teacher telling a porkie! Can you imagine telling a Cory Doctorow-style techgeek tale whilst spelling out all the acronyms? The horror! :)

As for the first point I'm not aware of any authority dictating that one is more correct than the other, though editorial types may have more to say on that front.

_________________
Shaun C. Green

Nostalgia For Infinity
Literature, gaming, punk rock... and all that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 31, 2007 2:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 2:13 pm
Posts: 868
Location: The Village
Speech with commas, a-okay grammar...
Not sure about using 'thusly' in 21st century England, though!
:P

_________________
Pigasus Press | VideoVista | The ZONE


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 31, 2007 2:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 11:27 am
Posts: 242
Location: Bethesda, Gwynedd
Tony wrote:
Speech with commas, a-okay grammar...
Not sure about using 'thusly' in 21st century England, though!
:P


I was being post-ironic :P


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 31, 2007 3:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 2:13 pm
Posts: 868
Location: The Village
Foxie wrote:
being post-ironic


Tsk. Even worse than 'thusly'!
:wink:

_________________
Pigasus Press | VideoVista | The ZONE


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 31, 2007 3:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 3:11 pm
Posts: 2122
Location: Cheshire, UK
The direct speech possibilities are OK. Your usage of either depends on context.

As for the acronyms I'd say again go by context and what would the speaking charactor or viewpoint charactor use. If it's more than a 3 letter abreviation/acronym then it would probably be unwise to do it phonetically.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 31, 2007 9:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 8:06 pm
Posts: 4
I'd say that if you want to emphasise in your story that the words are being spelled out, then maybe do it phonetically.

2 Good Books on Grammar

Elements of Style by Strunk is very good but it's written for US grammar, which means there are inconsistencies on punctuation.

I've also found Eats, Shoots and Leaves by Lynne Truss pretty good for UK punctuation.

Please note that just because I have both these books, doesn't mean I always follow what they say.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Does it matter?
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 7:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 2:36 pm
Posts: 72
Location: UK
At the end of the day if an editor likes your work enough they'll get someone to change it to how they want!

Mind you, if your grammar is that bad it'll get chucked out halfway through the first reading.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 30, 2007 7:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 12:46 am
Posts: 3347
Thusly:

"I will visit you," she said, "as soon as I have the money."
"Vist you?" she cried. " You're joking."

This is the rule I know.
If you take out the interruption, and the direct speech can stand as one sentence on its own, then the punctuation is as sentence one above (with a comma in the middle followed by lower case)
If the interruption is removed and the direct speech stands as two independent sentences, then it is punctuated as in example 2 above (with a full stop in the middle followed by upper case).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 30, 2007 8:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 6:50 am
Posts: 158
Location: Paris, France
I know the same rule as Marion.

_________________
http://www.aliettedebodard.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 30, 2007 8:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 02, 2007 8:30 pm
Posts: 371
Location: Barnsley, England
It's also the rule as they currently teach for KS3 and GCSE English - I've just realised I was sorting out some worksheets with this on before the summer holidays started. So sorry for the late chip in, etc.

_________________
Jo Thomas
http://www.journeymouse.net/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 31, 2007 8:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 9:25 am
Posts: 619
Location: Sussex Coast
I tend to use "Fowler's Modern English Usage" as my grammar Bible. But for things like formatting speech etc., I just check with the nearest few novels to hand.

_________________
http://www.scan-tech.co.uk/mikealx
http://www.myspace.com/veldtmusic
Folder printing high quality presentation folders


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 31, 2007 11:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 11:27 am
Posts: 242
Location: Bethesda, Gwynedd
Thanks for all the replies. One of the reasons I wondered is because the novels I'm reading these days contradict what I was told in school.

Marion put the speech thing succinctly and it's the rule I'm now using. It's what I was taught and it makes the speech flow better (in my opinion). I've also stopped spelling out letters, and it makes everything seem so much more readable!

Thanks again all.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group